An investigation of Students’ Organizational Problems of Cohesion and Coherence in English Essay Writing at Higher Secondary Levels of Sindh, Pakistan

  • Abdul Razzaque Lanjwani Jat Sukkur IBA University/Community College Dadu, Sindh, Pakistan
  • Ayaz Ali Jarah Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Shaheed Benazir Abad, Sindh, Paksitan
  • Siraj Ahmed Channa Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Shaheed Benazir Abad, Sindh, Paksitan
  • Javeed Iqbal Mirani Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Shaheed Benazir Abad, Sindh, Paksitan


Academic writing is a form of testing; moreover, most of the writing tasks and assignments across the country school curriculum, the designers of the writing assignments is also the audience and the evaluator, and that designer-evaluator expects student-writers to demonstrate particular knowledge and skills. Hence, like all the tests designers, developers of writing assignments should carefully consider different purposes, the parameters and constraints, and the evaluation criteria for each writing assignment. In this paper, we discussed organizational problems in essay writing such as, topic sentences, thesis statements, cohesion, coherence, completeness and unity. We applied a qualitative method for data collection.  For this, we selected one hundred students to write essays on different topics. Among them, we chose twenty written essays for data analysis. The findings suggested that students have organizational problems in English essay writing. It was found in their writings that most of the students have difficulties in organization their essay. Students get difficulties in introduction, topic sentence, thesis statement, transition of ideas, and use of cohesive devices, sequence and writing conclusion. There are certain reasons. Firstly, the effects of background information of particular topic and general information. Secondly, the low language proficiency, the students get it difficulty to create coherence and unity in their writings. It is because they give more importance to language and meanings.


1. Abdollahzadeh, E. (2010). Undergraduate Iranian EFL Learners’ Use of Writing. Writing, strategies and Pedagogy, 2 (1).
2. Albertson, K. (2006). College Student Observations of Expectations for Academic Literacy in Their First Term. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA.
3. Atay, D., & Kurt, G. (2006). Prospective Teachers and L2 Writing Anxiety. Asian EFL Journal, 8 (4).
4. Bacha, N. (2002). Developing Learners’ Academic Writing Skills in Higher Education: A Study for Educational Reform. Language &Education, 16(3), 161-177.
5. Chakraverty, A., & Gautum, K. (2000). Dynamics of writing. Forum, 38(3).
6. Chan, A. (2010). Toward a Taxonomy of Written Errors: Investigation Into the Written Errors of Hong Kong Cantonese ESL Learners. TESOL Quarterly. 44(2).
7. Cheng, Y. (2002). Factors Associated with Foreign Language Writing Anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35(5).
8. Dhillon, N., Fahmy, A., & Salehi-Isfahani, D. (2008). Egypt’s Education System: Parents and Students Emerge as a New Force for Reform. Middle East Youth Intiative, Point of view.
9. El-Koumy, A. (1997). Exploring the Reading- Writing Relationship in NES and EFL Students. ERIC, ED413781.
10. Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2004). Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Deakin: Deakin University.
12. Hassan, B. (2001). The Relationship of Writing Apprehension and Sef-Esteem to the Writing Quality and Quantity of EFL University Graduates. ERIC,
13. Hinkel, E. (2004). “Rhetorical Features of Text: Cohesion and Coherence”, Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, p.265.
14. Larios, J., Marin, J., & Murphy, L. (2001). A Temporal Analysis of Formulation Processes in L1and L2 Writing, Language Learning. 51(3).
15. Mourtaga, K. (2004). Investigating writing problems among Palestinian students studying English as a foreign language. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66 (1), 63.
16. Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
17. Qaddumi, M. (1995). Textual deviation and coherence problems in the writings of Arab students at the University of Bahrain: sources and solutions. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
18. Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 61 (2).
19. Reid, J. (1993a). Historical perspectives on writing and reading in the ESL classroom. In J. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 33-60). Boston: Heinle.
20. Rose, M. (1985). Complexity, rigor, evolving method, and the puzzle of writer’s block: Thoughts on composing-process research. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can’t write (pp. 227-260). NY: Guilford Press.
21. Selfe, C. (1984). The Predrafting Processes of Four High- and Four Low-Apprehensive Writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(1), 45-64.
22. Zamel, V. (1992). Writing one’s way into reading. TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 463-485.
23. Zheng, Y. (1999). Providing the students with effective feedback in the writing process. Teaching English in China, 36. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), Volume 1, Issue 4, December 2010 Copyright(C)
How to Cite
LANJWANI JAT, Abdul Razzaque et al. An investigation of Students’ Organizational Problems of Cohesion and Coherence in English Essay Writing at Higher Secondary Levels of Sindh, Pakistan. International Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Education, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 244-252, june 2020. ISSN 2521-0041. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 23 sep. 2021.